AFI #50: The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

I’m going to be critical of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Rings being on the AFI Top 100 list, so if you’re a big fan forgive me. I’d like to begin by saying I enjoyed this film, both this time and the first time I watched it when it debuted in 2001. I read the Tolkien books as a kid and I love the story. I also think this film and the other two films in the trilogy are wonderful and ambitious adaptations of the stories. Peter Jackson does a tremendous job bringing Middle Earth to life and the CGI and cinematography are great. I think it’s a good film, but it definitely does not belong on the list of the Top 100 films ever made. Here’s why…

The Fellowship of the Rings is not a complete film. It’s only one-third of a film, and while that’s not Jackson’s fault it does, in my mind, eliminate it from contention for this list because it really can’t stand on its own. I know, you’re thinking The Godfather is also a trilogy and surely I won’t argue against both parts one and two being on this list — and you’d be right. But The Fellowship of the Rings does not stand on its own as a story — it ends with a cliffhanger and that means the story is not complete. Sorry if you think I’m being ticky tacky, but it’s just not a complete film.

The fact is you can’t have a real discussion about the film without discussing the full trilogy. The characters are not fully developed and several important characters aren’t even introduced until the second film. I guess I wouldn’t have argued if AFI put the three films together and called it one of the Top 100. But they didn’t do that. Hell, the Oscar committee screwed it up as well. Fellowship got a best picture nomination and it shouldn’t have. Two Towers got the same treatment. Then the Academy went ballistic and threw the whole kit and caboodle at Return of the King and gave it 11 Oscars including best picture. If Return of the King was so good, why didn’t AFI give it the recognition? Bottom line for me is that Fellowship doesn’t deserve to be on this list. That being said, I enjoyed it and it’s a great fantasy film (er, piece of a film).

Next: Intolerance

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “AFI #50: The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

  1. Reason why you miss the mark here is because you fundamentally don’t understand afi’s criteria for good films. It’s not about whether the film is in your opinion “good” or “complete” (according to your own personal definition of complete). It’s about the novelty and influence it has on movies. Whether it represents some sort of breakthrough. That’s why birth of a nation is in the top 100. Ever wonder why that’s in there at all??? Must run! Bye!

  2. My name is Kari and I am a senior in college and was wanting to know if I could use the picture on this page for an appropriation piece in my art project. Please let me know. Thanks.

  3. The universal fit horse trailer covers are
    made for regular trailers and goose neck trailers and are made to fit
    any and all different types of trailers. These trailers
    provide defense against the next thunderstorm as well as other elements that may be damaging to people in the outdoors.
    Ute Hire Utes are currently available Ute hire Sydney , Canberra and Brisbane.

  4. Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your website?
    My website is in the very same niche as yours and my users would certainly benefit from a lot of the information you present here.
    Please let me know if this alright with you. Regards!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s